Google‘s Gemini 2.0 Flash mannequin can reportedly take away watermarks from user-provided pictures and depict copyrighted characters/celebrities in generated pictures, declare customers on Reddit (through ComputerBase). This consists of licensed inventory imagery discovered on-line, stamped with watermarks to point their copyrighted nature. This dangers potential litigation from media licensing companies. Restricted testing on our finish revealed that watermark removing was unsuccessful on a number of offered pictures, whereas the era of movie star pictures was potential.
Again in December, Google launched native picture output with Gemini 2.0 Flash for testing. Simply final week, this replace was made accessible throughout all areas, freed from cost, and features a slew of recent options equivalent to: telling a narrative with footage, conversational picture modifying, world understanding, textual content rendering, and extra. AI picture mills have persistently confronted scrutiny concerning moral and ethical issues.
Corporations like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI usually combine a set of guardrails or a listing of dos and don’ts of their fashions to fight the misuse of their applied sciences. The restrictions stretch large, however the common prohibitions usually embody depictions of celebrities and notably the removing of watermarks from copyrighted materials.
Lately, a number of Redditors discovered that Gemini’s native picture output function extends to watermark removing from inventory pictures, equivalent to these from Getty Pictures, and movie star picture era as effectively. Within the first case, this most likely violates a number of DMCA provisions as eradicating a watermark alters the CMI, which is info that identifies copyrighted work. The legality of producing movie star pictures utilizing AI is barely extra complicated, primarily involved over the safety of celebrities’ rights of publicity and issues surrounding deepfakes and potential defamation.
Gemini is pretty good in removing watermarks from r/singularity
Even so, the removing of the watermark would not change the actual fact the picture is probably going protected by copyright legislation. So you’ll be able to’t count on to make use of these pictures commercially, as you’d most likely be hit with a barrage of DMCA claims. Usually, people could need to take away the watermark, if mentioned picture is meant for private use-cases.
Opposite to the Reddit thread, we weren’t in a position to take away watermarks from the identical pictures, with Gemini responding, “Sadly, I can not straight edit pictures.” Conversational picture modifying works as meant in Google AI Studio, the place Gemini managed to breed the picture of a star, so there’s nonetheless some ironing out left to be executed.
It is vital to notice that Google has tagged the picture era function of Gemini 2.0 Flash as experimental. This can be why it is solely obtainable in Google AI Studio and never on Gemini’s important web site and will additionally clarify these lapses in judgment.
The post Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash is reportedly capable of removing watermarks — Also found to generate AI celebrity photos appeared first on MORSHEDI.